On the go: The Department for Work and Pensions has been accused of continuing to “wrongly” tell women they have no pension entitlement when, in some cases, they were due thousands each year.
In a letter sent to pensions minister Guy Opperman on June 7, LCP partner Sir Steve Webb evidenced four examples between 2020 and 2022 where he alleged the department made errors in its calculations of state pension entitlements.
Webb, who was pensions minister under David Cameron, said although the number of examples in the letter is small, they were “potentially life-changing” for all the women concerned.
Webb submitted a freedom of information request to the DWP in 2019, which highlighted similar errors that relate to women who previously paid a reduced rate of national insurance contributions.
These women can find that, under the rules of the new state pension, they lack the 10 years of full rate contributions necessary to qualify for any state pension.
But there is a special concession for such individuals, provided that they were paying the reduced stamp 35 years before they retired.
These women can automatically get a pension of £85 a week if they are married, or £141.85 if they are widowed or divorced.
A National Audit Office report was published last year blaming the DWP for “years” of “human errors”, which have resulted in a total of 134,000 pensioners — 90 per cent of whom are understood to be women — being underpaid state pension entitlements to the collective tune of £1bn.
The government department is currently embarking on a legal entitlements and administrative practices exercise, which has seen it spend millions on recruiting hundreds of staff to address and remedy these underpayments.
But Webb has now drawn the DWP’s attention to examples since then, the most recent dating to a woman who retired in April 2022.
In two of the four cases, he said women were told they had no pension entitlement, when in fact they were due a pension of just over £86 and £85 a week, respectively, taking both their annual pension provisions from zero to more than £4,000.
The DWP has accepted these payments in both these cases after one woman contacted her local MP, and after the other threatened to contact hers.
“When DWP admitted to me that they had been making errors for this group of women, I assumed that they would have put in place procedures to sort out the problem,” Webb said.
“Yet I continue to hear from women who have been wrongly told that they are not entitled to a pension.
“What is particularly worrying about these errors is that DWP apparently already knew that there was a potential problem and thought they had fixed it.”
Webb also cited his ongoing concern over how many other women there may be who have trusted what the DWP has told them and are now struggling to get by without a pension they might be entitled to.
In his letter, Webb said the DWP should be checking all of its records for such cases and putting things right, as well as making sure that these mistakes cannot happen again.
In the past, a DWP spokesperson has said it encourages women and men to contact the department if they get divorced or if their civil partnership is dissolved, and that every year it reminds people about doing so alongside the uprating notifications it sends out.
“We want everyone to claim the benefits to which they may be entitled, and we urge anyone of state pension age — or their family and friends — to check if they are missing out on financial support,” it has said.
The DWP has been approached for comment.
This article originally appeared on FTAdviser.com
